TSTP Solution File: ITP270^1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : ITP270^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 22:17:49 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 53.11s 14.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 53.11s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   22
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   46 (  15 unt;  14 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   59 (   8 equ;   0 cnn)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    6 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :  197 (  29   ~;  15   |;   2   &; 141   @)
%                                         (   2 <=>;   8  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    9 (   6 avg)
%            Number of types       :    3 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    9 (   9   >;   0   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of symbols     :   14 (  12 usr;   7 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   34 (   0   ^  34   !;   0   ?;  34   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
thf(decl_sort1,type,
    num: $tType ).

thf(decl_sort2,type,
    nat: $tType ).

thf(decl_318,type,
    one_one_nat: nat ).

thf(decl_565,type,
    suc: nat > nat ).

thf(decl_629,type,
    bit0: num > num ).

thf(decl_631,type,
    one: num ).

thf(decl_639,type,
    numeral_numeral_nat: num > nat ).

thf(decl_679,type,
    ord_less_nat: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_694,type,
    ord_less_eq_nat: nat > nat > $o ).

thf(decl_742,type,
    power_power_nat: nat > nat > nat ).

thf(decl_1087,type,
    deg: nat ).

thf(decl_1089,type,
    ma: nat ).

thf(decl_1090,type,
    mi: nat ).

thf(decl_1094,type,
    x: nat ).

thf(fact_330_order_Oasym,axiom,
    ! [X685: nat,X686: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_nat @ X685 @ X686 )
     => ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X686 @ X685 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_330_order_Oasym) ).

thf(fact_1__C5_Ohyps_C_I8_J,axiom,
    ord_less_nat @ ma @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_1__C5_Ohyps_C_I8_J) ).

thf(fact_2973_Suc__1,axiom,
    ( ( suc @ one_one_nat )
    = ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_2973_Suc__1) ).

thf(fact_602_dual__order_Ostrict__trans1,axiom,
    ! [X1331: nat,X1332: nat,X1333: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X1331 @ X1332 )
     => ( ( ord_less_nat @ X1333 @ X1331 )
       => ( ord_less_nat @ X1333 @ X1332 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_602_dual__order_Ostrict__trans1) ).

thf(fact_24__092_060open_062x_A_092_060le_062_Ama_A_092_060and_062_Ami_A_092_060le_062_Ax_092_060close_062,axiom,
    ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ x @ ma )
    & ( ord_less_eq_nat @ mi @ x ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_24__092_060open_062x_A_092_060le_062_Ama_A_092_060and_062_Ami_A_092_060le_062_Ax_092_060close_062) ).

thf(fact_346_antisym__conv3,axiom,
    ! [X74: nat,X724: nat] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X74 @ X724 )
     => ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X724 @ X74 )
      <=> ( X724 = X74 ) ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_346_antisym__conv3) ).

thf(conj_0,conjecture,
    ord_less_nat @ x @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',conj_0) ).

thf(fact_512_leD,axiom,
    ! [X74: nat,X1156: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X74 @ X1156 )
     => ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X1156 @ X74 ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',fact_512_leD) ).

thf(c_0_8,plain,
    ! [X685: nat,X686: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_nat @ X685 @ X686 )
     => ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X686 @ X685 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_330_order_Oasym]) ).

thf(c_0_9,plain,
    ! [X26955: nat,X26956: nat] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X26955 @ X26956 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X26956 @ X26955 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_8])]) ).

thf(c_0_10,plain,
    ord_less_nat @ ma @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1__C5_Ohyps_C_I8_J]) ).

thf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( ( suc @ one_one_nat )
    = ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_2973_Suc__1]) ).

thf(c_0_12,plain,
    ! [X27079: nat,X27080: nat,X27081: nat] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X27079 @ X27080 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X27081 @ X27079 )
      | ( ord_less_nat @ X27081 @ X27080 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_602_dual__order_Ostrict__trans1])]) ).

thf(c_0_13,plain,
    ! [X17: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X1 @ X17 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X17 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9]) ).

thf(c_0_14,plain,
    ord_less_nat @ ma @ ( power_power_nat @ ( suc @ one_one_nat ) @ deg ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_15,plain,
    ! [X18: nat,X17: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_nat @ X18 @ X17 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X17 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X18 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_12]) ).

thf(c_0_16,plain,
    ord_less_eq_nat @ x @ ma,
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_24__092_060open_062x_A_092_060le_062_Ama_A_092_060and_062_Ami_A_092_060le_062_Ax_092_060close_062]) ).

thf(c_0_17,plain,
    ! [X74: nat,X724: nat] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X74 @ X724 )
     => ( ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X724 @ X74 )
      <=> ( X724 = X74 ) ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_346_antisym__conv3]) ).

thf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_nat @ x @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])]) ).

thf(c_0_19,plain,
    ! [X74: nat,X1156: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X74 @ X1156 )
     => ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X1156 @ X74 ) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[fact_512_leD]) ).

thf(c_0_20,plain,
    ~ ( ord_less_nat @ ( power_power_nat @ ( suc @ one_one_nat ) @ deg ) @ ma ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

thf(c_0_21,plain,
    ! [X1: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_nat @ X1 @ ma )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X1 @ x ) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_22,plain,
    ! [X26967: nat,X26968: nat] :
      ( ( ( ord_less_nat @ X26968 @ X26967 )
        | ( X26968 = X26967 )
        | ( ord_less_nat @ X26967 @ X26968 ) )
      & ( ( X26968 != X26967 )
        | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X26968 @ X26967 )
        | ( ord_less_nat @ X26967 @ X26968 ) ) ),
    inference(distribute,[status(thm)],[inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_17])])]) ).

thf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_nat @ x @ ( power_power_nat @ ( numeral_numeral_nat @ ( bit0 @ one ) ) @ deg ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_18]) ).

thf(c_0_24,plain,
    ! [X27061: nat,X27062: nat] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X27061 @ X27062 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X27062 @ X27061 ) ),
    inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[c_0_19])]) ).

thf(c_0_25,plain,
    ~ ( ord_less_nat @ ( power_power_nat @ ( suc @ one_one_nat ) @ deg ) @ x ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21]) ).

thf(c_0_26,plain,
    ! [X17: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ( ord_less_nat @ X1 @ X17 )
      | ( X1 = X17 )
      | ( ord_less_nat @ X17 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_22]) ).

thf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ( ord_less_nat @ x @ ( power_power_nat @ ( suc @ one_one_nat ) @ deg ) ),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_11]) ).

thf(c_0_28,plain,
    ! [X17: nat,X1: nat] :
      ( ~ ( ord_less_eq_nat @ X1 @ X17 )
      | ~ ( ord_less_nat @ X17 @ X1 ) ),
    inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_24]) ).

thf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( ( power_power_nat @ ( suc @ one_one_nat ) @ deg )
    = x ),
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26]),c_0_27]) ).

thf(c_0_30,plain,
    ~ ( ord_less_nat @ ma @ x ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_16]) ).

thf(c_0_31,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem    : ITP270^1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.03/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.35  % Computer : n002.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.35  % DateTime   : Sat May 18 16:54:38 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.18/0.48  Running higher-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover-ho --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 53.11/14.41  # Version: 3.1.0-ho
% 53.11/14.41  # partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 53.11/14.41  # Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 53.11/14.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # new_bool_2 with pid 1144 completed with status 0
% 53.11/14.41  # Result found by new_bool_2
% 53.11/14.41  # partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 53.11/14.41  # Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 53.11/14.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 53.11/14.41  # Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 53.11/14.41  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_ho_10 with 180s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # new_ho_10 with pid 1145 completed with status 0
% 53.11/14.41  # Result found by new_ho_10
% 53.11/14.41  # partial match(2): HMLMSMSMSSLCHFA
% 53.11/14.41  # Preprocessing class: HMLLSMLMSSLCHFA.
% 53.11/14.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_ho_10 with 1500s (5) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_bool_2 with 300s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 53.11/14.41  # Search class: HGHSM-SMLM32-DHFFFSBN
% 53.11/14.41  # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 299 seconds (299 total)
% 53.11/14.41  # Starting new_ho_10 with 180s (1) cores
% 53.11/14.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.217 s
% 53.11/14.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 53.11/14.41  
% 53.11/14.41  # Proof found!
% 53.11/14.41  # SZS status Theorem
% 53.11/14.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 53.11/14.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 11424
% 53.11/14.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 7988
% 53.11/14.41  # Initial clauses                      : 8989
% 53.11/14.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 1956
% 53.11/14.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 7033
% 53.11/14.41  # Processed clauses                    : 12946
% 53.11/14.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 345
% 53.11/14.41  # ...subsumed                          : 3235
% 53.11/14.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 9366
% 53.11/14.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 2061
% 53.11/14.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 53.11/14.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 67
% 53.11/14.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 125
% 53.11/14.41  # Generated clauses                    : 80096
% 53.11/14.41  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 67867
% 53.11/14.41  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 53.11/14.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 99
% 53.11/14.41  # Paramodulations                      : 77972
% 53.11/14.41  # Factorizations                       : 14
% 53.11/14.41  # NegExts                              : 0
% 53.11/14.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 2120
% 53.11/14.41  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 53.11/14.41  # Total rewrite steps                  : 32649
% 53.11/14.41  # ...of those cached                   : 28387
% 53.11/14.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 53.11/14.41  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 53.11/14.41  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 53.11/14.41  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 53.11/14.41  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 53.11/14.41  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 53.11/14.41  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 53.11/14.41  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 53.11/14.41  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 53.11/14.41  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 53.11/14.41  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 53.11/14.41  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 53.11/14.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 3291
% 53.11/14.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 817
% 53.11/14.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 42
% 53.11/14.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 319
% 53.11/14.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 2113
% 53.11/14.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 66613
% 53.11/14.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 187257
% 53.11/14.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 53.11/14.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 5027
% 53.11/14.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 19175474
% 53.11/14.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2552170
% 53.11/14.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 1852
% 53.11/14.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 199887
% 53.11/14.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 53.11/14.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 1659
% 53.11/14.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 539
% 53.11/14.41  # Condensation attempts                : 12946
% 53.11/14.41  # Condensation successes               : 46
% 53.11/14.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 3703432
% 53.11/14.41  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 187435
% 53.11/14.41  
% 53.11/14.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 53.11/14.41  # User time                : 12.810 s
% 53.11/14.41  # System time              : 0.158 s
% 53.11/14.41  # Total time               : 12.968 s
% 53.11/14.41  # Maximum resident set size: 48252 pages
% 53.11/14.41  
% 53.11/14.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 53.11/14.41  # User time                : 13.640 s
% 53.11/14.41  # System time              : 0.188 s
% 53.11/14.41  # Total time               : 13.828 s
% 53.11/14.41  # Maximum resident set size: 27412 pages
% 53.11/14.41  % E---3.1 exiting
% 53.11/14.41  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------